Studio Fat Window to Web Client Window App
Stephen Miller
Stephen.Miller at isofthealth.com
Wed Apr 22 03:44:32 EDT 2009
Please do Sven..
" If you want to I can send to you off list the example that I use at
Euromnis lecturing - that might give you some insights on how one can
Work with solutions that will work across different deployment modes."
Brian
Citrix is brilliant - there is no doubt about that but there certainly
are issues with printing support and the general cost. (Of course if you
get enough licenses it is cheap - I have heard of some sites paying $150
a connection).
One of the problems with Citrix though is the total cost of getting ALL
the applications used onto the system. Typically sites start with a list
of 2-3 applications and then end up with many multiples of this for
users who need half a dozen Microsoft apps and scientific calculators,
special text editors etc. Especially with MS apps we are talking about a
serious amount of memory required per connection.
Michael's new web-client version of his word processor may be very
valuable to some sites in this regard.
Another very interesting solution is the old Tarantella product -
rebadged and developed by Sun as their Secure Desktop. Cheap and
performance is good.
Maybe this is worth considering Brian?
Regards
Stephen Miller
Subject: Re: Studio Fat Window to Web Client Window App
Hi Brian,
As far as I can see it mainly depends on the degree of objectification
in your app, especially the data management. I do not think that one
can perform an automatic conversion and get a good, fast and secure
web client app corresponding in functionality to a client-server
version. The best approach if one can afford it is to rebuild from the
beginning.
If you want to I can send to you off list the example that I use at
Euromnis lecturing - that might give you some insights on how one can
work with solutions that will work across different deployment modes.
Take care,
Stene
___
21 apr 2009 kl. 17.33 skrev Brian O'Sullivan:
> Also curious of others' experience in migrating thick Omnis
> applications to the Omnis web-client paradigm - an option I've been
> asked to evaluate for our applications at DuPont, not on technical
> merits, but rather as cost-avoidance. At present we host our thick-
> client apps from a Citrix farm, and we're hosting that on Win2003
> servers, which will soon go unsupported, and Microsoft exacts a not
> insignificant license fee to upgrade to the next supported server
> OS. So we either pay MS lots of money to maintain the current level
> of functionality, or invest time/$$ into web-client. My gut reaction
> was that we'd spend more $$ in programming time to adapt the thick
> apps for web-client, but if there is an automated tool to do the
> grunt work of creating web-forms, that may make the option more
> feasible. Of course there are other architectural considerations, as
> well as coming up to speed with the web-client functionality and
> limitations vs. thick-client GUI controls, etc. Opinions?
>
> -----------------------------------
> Brian O'Sullivan; Bear, DE
_____________________________________________________________
Manage your list subscriptions at http://lists.omnis-dev.com
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
More information about the omnisdev-en
mailing list